Bu yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131rken 19.03.2016 tarihinde Beyo\u011flu\u2019nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu a\u011f\u0131r yaralanan 2 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Asya ya\u015fam m\u00fccadelesi veriyordu. Ortado\u011fu\u2019nun karanl\u0131k g\u00f6lgesinin d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u00e7ocuk \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilemiyor. 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda sadece haberlere yans\u0131yan -ve maalesef isimlerine \u00f6l\u00fcmleri nedeniyle a\u015fina oldu\u011fumuz- \u00e7ocuklardan baz\u0131lar\u0131: 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Bar\u0131\u015f Dalm\u0131\u015f, 14 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00dcmit Kurt, 12 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Nihat Kazanhan, 16 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Adem \u0130rteg\u00fcn, 10 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Emin Yana\u015f, 7 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Baran \u00c7a\u011fl\u0131. Bu isimlerin yan\u0131na her yeni g\u00fcn Emin Yana\u015f, Baran \u00c7a\u011fl\u0131 gibi yenilerinin yaz\u0131lmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in neler yap\u0131labilir? Ya da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a korunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcndeyken bu ihlalin a\u015fikarl\u0131\u011f\u0131, hukuk \u00f6n\u00fcne daha fazla nas\u0131l ta\u015f\u0131nabilir?<\/p>\n
Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’ne taraf olan her devlet, ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6ncelikle negatif sorumlulu\u011fa sahiptir. Bu sorumluluk gere\u011fi devletler ilk olarak, ya\u015fama son vermekten ka\u00e7\u0131nma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tabi tutulmu\u015flard\u0131r. Devletler, egemenlikleri alt\u0131nda bulunduklar\u0131 ki\u015filerin hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 korumak ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 sonland\u0131rmamak zorundad\u0131rlar.[foot]Ula\u015f Karan, \u201cYa\u015fam Hakk\u0131\u201d, i\u00e7inde Sibel \u0130nceo\u011flu (Ed) , \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ve Anayasa, Beta Yay., Ekim , 2013, s. 130 vd.[\/foot] Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019nin T\u00fcrkiye aleyhine, son on y\u0131l i\u00e7erisinde, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline dair verdi\u011fi en ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 karar, hi\u00e7 ku\u015fkusuz 21 Kas\u0131m 2004\u2019te Mardin\u2019de 13 kur\u015funla vurularak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden 12 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki U\u011fur Kaymaz karar\u0131d\u0131r. Karar, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline g\u00f6z yumuldu\u011funu g\u00f6steren di\u011fer davalara da emsal olma niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131r. Ancak, T\u00fcrkiye Devleti’nin davadaki mahkumiyeti \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fama haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesine neden olamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kafalar\u0131na gaz kaps\u00fcl\u00fc isabet etmesiyle hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden Mahsun M\u0131zrak ve Berkin Elvan \u00f6rnekleri de \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011finin, gaz fi\u015fe\u011fi kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve nihayet \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fama haklar\u0131n\u0131n pervas\u0131zca ihlal edildi\u011finin ba\u015fl\u0131ca g\u00f6stergeleridir.[foot]G\u00f6k\u00e7er Tahincio\u011flu, Devlet Dersi \u00c7ocuk Hak \u0130hlallerinde Cezas\u0131zl\u0131k \u00d6yk\u00fcleri, Nota Bene Yay., Ankara, 2015,s 59-77,73-81.[\/foot] Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, 25 \u015eubat 2014\u2019te verdi\u011fi U\u011fur Kaymaz karar\u0131nda neredeyse bug\u00fcnleri g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ve hukuken yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekenleri s\u0131ralarken en \u00e7ok ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sabit oldu\u011fu durumlarda davaya ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7lere dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Demokratik toplum d\u00fczenlerinde olmas\u0131 gereken, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle devletlerin ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmemeleridir. Ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi her durumda ise devletin ilk y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc resmi ve etkin bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmektir. Bu etkin soru\u015fturman\u0131n her bir hukuki a\u015famas\u0131 devlet taraf\u0131ndan takip edilmelidir. Fakat T\u00fcrkiye aleyhine sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015f bir\u00e7ok \u00f6rnek karar ve uygulama bizlere \u00e7ocuk \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinde etkin ve resmi bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n ya da kovu\u015fturman\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclemedi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n
Adil yarg\u0131lama gere\u011fi, ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 ihlal edilenlerin ailelerinin, yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecini yaln\u0131z de\u011fil, devlet deste\u011fiyle y\u00fcr\u00fctmeleri gerekir. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin say\u0131s\u0131z mahkumiyet almas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni, faili devlet olan davalarda cezas\u0131zl\u0131k durumunun s\u00fcre\u011fen hale gelmesidir. Bu t\u00fcr davalarda, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM) karar\u0131ndan sonra, adil yarg\u0131lama ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Devlet’in yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi m\u00fcessesini i\u015fletmemesi, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin uygulamas\u0131n\u0131n sadece tazminat olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi hukuk devletinin kerhen, ka\u011f\u0131t \u00fczerinde kalmas\u0131na neden olmaktad\u0131r. Oysa sadece “\u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00e7ocuk olmalar\u0131” nedeniyle \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcn yarar\u0131n\u0131n, veli ya da vasilerinden \u00f6te devlet taraf\u0131ndan takip edilmesi gerekmektedir. Anayasam\u0131zda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclenin aksine uygulamada, hukuk devletinin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmamas\u0131 gibi sosyal devletin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 da bulunmamaktad\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu durumun \u00e7ocuk istismar\u0131 davalar\u0131nda da \u00f6rnekleri ne ac\u0131d\u0131r ki s\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00c7ocuk istismar\u0131 davalar\u0131nda kimsesiz \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n, \u00c7ocuk Esirgeme Kurumu’nun – yeni ad\u0131yla \u00c7ocuk Hizmetleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn – vekillerinin az ya da ilgisiz dava takibine maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ektir. Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n taraf oldu\u011fu her davada barolar\u0131n adli yard\u0131mlar\u0131ndan ya da CMK birimlerinden atanan m\u00fcdafiilerin, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n duru\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 isterse takip ettikleri ya da hi\u00e7 etmedikleri g\u00f6zlemlenmektedir. \u0130stismar davalar\u0131nda, ceza ve adli ve cezai her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kovu\u015fturmada \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n kimsesizli\u011fi b\u00f6yleyken, ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 ihlallerinde de davalar\u0131n takibi sadece ailelere ve g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc avukatlara kalmaktad\u0131r. Halbuki Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin Adil Yarg\u0131lanmaya ili\u015fkin 6. maddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131, m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenlemektedir. \u0130mzac\u0131 devletler taraf olman\u0131n verdi\u011fi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck gere\u011fi buna uymak zorunlulu\u011fundad\u0131rlar. M\u00fcdafii olmaks\u0131z\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lamalar, avukat\u0131n dikkatinden yoksun ifadeler, hem su\u00e7tan zarar g\u00f6ren hem de su\u00e7a s\u00fcr\u00fcklenen \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 hukuki garabetlerle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya b\u0131rakmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Sosyal devletin ancak Kara Avrupas\u0131nda yerle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde; az geli\u015fmi\u015f, kapitalist hukuk sistemlerinde, paras\u0131z hukuk hizmeti alman\u0131n olanaks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ger\u00e7ektir. Kapitalizmin her alanda s\u00f6z sahibi oldu\u011fu, burjuva hak temelli hukuk sistemlerinin ezilen taraf\u0131, her zaman kendini hakk\u0131n\u0131 koruyacak hukuki yard\u0131m\u0131 alamayanlard\u0131r. Hem \u00e7ocu\u011fun cinsel istismar\u0131 hem de ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ihlallerinde olan, asl\u0131nda en kaba haliyle budur. U\u011fur Kaymaz Davas\u0131nda A\u0130HM’in tarafs\u0131z yarg\u0131laman\u0131n alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmesine ra\u011fmen hal\u00e2 benzer ihlaller tekrar ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Halbuki karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a:<\/p>\n
Mahkeme, S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 2. maddesi ile \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, 1. madde uyar\u0131nca \u201ckendi yetki alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde MAKBULE KAYMAZ VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 \/ T\u00dcRK\u0130YE KARARI bulunan herkese S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin (…) de a\u00e7\u0131klanan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerden yararlanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flarlar\u201d \u015feklinde Devlete d\u00fc\u015fen genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n bir insan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sebep olmas\u0131 halinde resmi ve etkin bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fini ve bunu \u015fart ko\u015ftu\u011funu hat\u0131rlatmaktad\u0131r (bk. mutatis mutandis McCann ve di\u011ferleri, yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan, p. 161 ve Kaya \/ T\u00fcrkiye, 19 \u015eubat 1998, p. 105, \u00d6zet 1998-I). Fail olduklar\u0131 iddia edilenler ister devlet g\u00f6revlileri isterse \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer olsun, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n bir insan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 her durumda benzeri bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmelidir (Tahsin Acar \/ T\u00fcrkiye [BD], No. 26307\/95, p. 220, A\u0130HM 2004-III). Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar \u00f6zellikle kapsaml\u0131, tarafs\u0131z ve dikkatli olmal\u0131d\u0131r.(Yelden ve di\u011ferleri \/ T\u00fcrkiye, No. 16850\/09, p. 71, 3 May\u0131s 2012).[foot]MAKBULE KAYMAZ VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 \/ T\u00dcRK\u0130YE DAVASI (Ba\u015fvuru No. 651\/10)[\/foot]<\/p>\n
diyerek soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n kapsaml\u0131, tarafs\u0131z ve dikkatli y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gerekti\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bu karar\u0131n aksine, T\u00fcrkiye yarg\u0131s\u0131, Gezi s\u00fcreci sonras\u0131 da \u00f6rneklerine \u00e7ok\u00e7a tan\u0131k oldu\u011fumuz, duru\u015fmalar\u0131n kendi mahkemesinde de\u011fil de, ailelerin, yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n ve takip\u00e7ilerinin ula\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131 illerde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi;[foot]http:\/\/bianet.org\/bianet\/hukuk\/151248-ali-is mail-korkmaz-davasi-kayseri-ye-tasindi E.T: 06.02.2016.[\/foot] savc\u0131[foot]http:\/\/www.haberturk.com\/gundem\/haber\/ 1023596-ali-ismail-korkmaz-davasinda-savci degisti E.T: 06.02.2016.[\/foot] ve\/veya hakimle-
\nrin[foot]http:\/\/www.bizimatalya.com\/haber-88927-Gezi davasi_hakimi_yine_degisti#.Vr9hb_mLTIU E.T: 06.02.2016,http:\/\/ww.gazet-vatan.com\/-sike ve-carsi-hakimleri-degisti-737464-gundem\/ E.T: 06.02.2016[\/foot] de\u011fi\u015fmesi gibi tarafs\u0131zl\u0131kla ba\u011fda\u015fmayan kararlara imza atmaktad\u0131r. Bu karar\u0131n aksine, T\u00fcrkiye yarg\u0131s\u0131 her ge\u00e7en g\u00fcn, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden, hukuk g\u00fcvenli\u011fiyle uyu\u015fmayan; kapsaml\u0131, tarafs\u0131z ve dikkatli olmaktan son derece uzak olan kovu\u015fturmalar yuma\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7ine s\u00fcr\u00fcklenmektedir. Ancak, bu konuya ili\u015fkin A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7 hukukta ka\u011f\u0131t \u00fczerinde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu g\u00f6steren, Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin g\u00fcncel kararlar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. 16.12.2015 tarihli Yavuz Durmu\u015f ve Di\u011ferleri ve 23.01.2014 tarihli Sad\u0131k Ko\u00e7ak ve Di\u011ferleri kararlar\u0131nda, Anayasan\u0131n Ki\u015finin Dokunulmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Maddi ve Manevi Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin 17. maddesi gere\u011fi ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 zamanda devlete pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler y\u00fckledi\u011finin, bunun usuli boyutunda ise devletin ya\u015fanan \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm y\u00f6nlerinin ortaya konmas\u0131nda ve sorumlu ki\u015filerin bulunmas\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmesi gerekti\u011finin alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmi\u015ftir. Ancak uygulamada bug\u00fcn, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015fama haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlallerinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcm\u00fcz gibi etkili soru\u015fturmalar y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemektedir. Bu da A\u0130HS ve ek protokollerinin i\u00e7 hukukta sadece karar \u00fczerinde uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, uygulamada ise kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi bu cezas\u0131zl\u0131k hali hem \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n hem de yeti\u015fkinlerin ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak kavrayan geni\u015f bir etki alan\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Berkin Elvan davas\u0131nda kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n uzun s\u00fcre bulunamamas\u0131, Ali \u0130smail Korkmaz’\u0131n hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmesine neden olan dayak g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin tesad\u00fcfen ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 asl\u0131nda hukuk devletinin \u015feffafl\u0131k, delile ula\u015fma, silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi gibi en basit d\u00fczeyde olmas\u0131 gereken ilkelerinin bile yok say\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Kendi avukat\u0131n\u0131 tutabilecek, davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fehre gidebilecek, hakimin ve savc\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fmesini engelleyebilecekler i\u00e7in adalete ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnebilir. Asl\u0131nda bu sadece adalete ili\u015fkin de\u011fildir. Kapitalizmin her alanda oldu\u011fu gibi bu co\u011frafyada da \u00e7ocu\u011fa verdi\u011fi \u00f6nem budur. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n en az adalet kadar e\u011fitim, sa\u011fl\u0131k gibi temel ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131 da onlar\u0131n ailelerinin sahip oldu\u011fu ekonomik gelir ve ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6lgeye ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.[foot]Seda Ak\u00e7o Bilen, \u201c\u00c7ocuk Hukukunda Nerede Duruyoruz?\u201d, i\u00e7inde Haluk \u0130nan\u0131c\u0131 (Ed), T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de Hukuku Yeniden D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek, \u0130leti\u015fim Yay., 2015, s.345 vd.[\/foot]<\/p>\n
\u00c7ocuklar\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 hukuksuzluklar ve cezas\u0131zl\u0131k halleri bu denli a\u015fikarken, di\u011fer bir yandan da Diyarbak\u0131r \u00c7\u0131nar\u2019da be\u015f ayl\u0131k, 1 ya\u015f\u0131nda ve 5 ya\u015f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 \u00e7ocu\u011fun PKK taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi, devletin silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fman\u0131n bir taraf\u0131 oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek polis \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi,[foot]http:\/\/www.milliyet.com.tr\/diyarbakir-da-es zamanli-teror-gundem-2178644\/ E.T: 06.02.2016.[\/foot] \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu lojmanlar\u0131n hedef al\u0131nmas\u0131 kabul edilemez ba\u015fka bir noktad\u0131r. G\u00fc\u00e7 odaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 hedef almas\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n savunmas\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131 ya da \u00e7ocuk adaletine giden yollar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n \u00e7ocuk gibi ya\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7mektedir.<\/p>\n
Hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra s\u00fcregelen \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma ortamlar\u0131nda \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n do\u011frudan silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalarda taraf olmalar\u0131 ya da silah alt\u0131na al\u0131nmalar\u0131 da engellenmelidir. Zaten \u00c7ocuk Haklar\u0131na Dair S\u00f6zle\u015fme Ek Protokol\u2019\u00fcn 4. maddesi gere\u011fi devletin sorumlulu\u011funun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctlere de \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 silah alt\u0131na almama, \u00f6rg\u00fcte kabul etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc devletlere getirilmi\u015ftir.[foot]http:\/\/cocukhizmetleri.aile.gov.tr\/data \/544e260b369dc318044059ac\/cocuk_haklarina dair_4991_kanun_numarali_protokol.pdf E.T: 06.02.2016., Bilen, \u201cSilahl\u0131 \u00c7at\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00c7ocuklar \u00dczerindeki Etkisi\u201d G\u00fcncel Hukuk, \u015eubat 2016\/2-146, s. 10-11.[\/foot]<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 Yerine<\/strong><\/p>\n Hukuk Devleti’nin olmazsa olmaz\u0131, gittik\u00e7e s\u0131radan hale getirilen \u00e7ocuk \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin durdurulmas\u0131 ve konuya ili\u015fkin etkin bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle ilerleyen s\u00fcre\u00e7te izlenecek yol g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 sonucunda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n dava a\u015famalar\u0131nda, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerinin en ince detaylar\u0131yla ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, soru\u015fturman\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi, t\u00fcm delillerin toplanmas\u0131, \u00f6l\u00fcm olaylar\u0131nda hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybedenlerin yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma ve dava a\u015famalar\u0131nda hukuki s\u00fcre\u00e7lere kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r.[foot]Karan, s. 130 vd.,[\/foot] \u00c7ocuklar\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir \u00fclkede adalet duygusunun yoksunlu\u011fu her ge\u00e7en g\u00fcn daha fazla kendini g\u00f6stermektedir. Biz hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131n bu noktada yapmas\u0131 gereken ise, \u00e7ocuk \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir toplumsal ya\u015fam\u0131n in\u015fas\u0131na kat\u0131lmak ve g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 sonucu hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n hukuk m\u00fccadelelerini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bu yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131rken 19.03.2016 tarihinde Beyo\u011flu\u2019nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu a\u011f\u0131r yaralanan 2 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Asya ya\u015fam m\u00fccadelesi veriyordu. Ortado\u011fu\u2019nun karanl\u0131k g\u00f6lgesinin d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u00e7ocuk \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilemiyor. 2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda sadece haberlere yans\u0131yan -ve maalesef isimlerine \u00f6l\u00fcmleri nedeniyle a\u015fina oldu\u011fumuz- \u00e7ocuklardan baz\u0131lar\u0131: 15 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Bar\u0131\u015f Dalm\u0131\u015f, 14 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00dcmit Kurt, 12 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki Nihat Kazanhan, 16 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":43,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayilar-1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/43"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1761\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}