Seviyorum bu \u00fclkeyi, yasaklamasalar bir g\u00fcn kutlanacak 1 May\u0131s, sayelerinde bir hafta \/bir ay s\u00fcr\u00fcyor, sadece bir meydan de\u011fil \u0130stanbul\u2019un heryeri Taksim oluyor.<\/p>\n
1 May\u0131s g\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de ba\u015flamad\u0131 ama \u201cEmek ve Dayan\u0131\u015fma G\u00fcn\u00fc\u201d olarak varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrebilme m\u00fccadelesi hem hukuksal hem eylemsel y\u00f6nden en \u00e7ok T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de veriliyor.<\/p>\n
Emek\u00e7ilerin ya\u015famlar\u0131 pahas\u0131na sahip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131 Taksim Meydan\u0131, kendine ve tarihine yak\u0131\u015f\u0131r \u015fekilde \u0130HAM kararlar\u0131na ge\u00e7en ilk meydan oldu, ilk kez bir meydan bir karar\u0131n \u00f6znesi oldu. Bu yaz\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak bu karara yer verece\u011fim.<\/p>\n
D\u0130SK ve KESK ad\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine verdi\u011fi \u0130HAM\u2019\u0131n 27.11.2012 tarihli 38676 \/ 08 b\u015fv.no\u2019lu karar 1 May\u0131s ve Taksim Alan\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015f bir \u00f6zeti niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n
Daha \u00f6nce \u00e7e\u015fitli y\u00f6nleri ile farkl\u0131 platformlarda par\u00e7a par\u00e7a yer bulan karar\u0131n, yay\u0131n hayat\u0131na yeni ba\u015flayan bir hukuk dergisinin ilk say\u0131s\u0131nda yer almas\u0131, 1 May\u0131s Taksim tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n hukuksal tezlerinin bir arada sunulmas\u0131 g\u00fczel bir bulu\u015fma oldu.<\/p>\n
\u00dclkemiz i\u00e7in \u00f6nemli oldu\u011fu kadar \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 De\u011ferleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan emsal olan D\u0130SK & KESK karar\u0131 \u00f6nemli tespitler i\u00e7eriyor. Ba\u015fvurumuzun \u0130HAM\u2019\u0131n inceleme s\u00fcrecinde bizlerin ve h\u00fck\u00fcmetin t\u00fcm tezleri ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131 ve t\u00fcm konular kararda cevapland\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130HAM; “Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda, dosyadaki belgelerden a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r ki, yetkililer ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Bayram\u0131’n\u0131 Taksim Meydan\u0131’nda kutlama niyetleri hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olur olmaz, g\u00f6steriyi engellemek i\u00e7in kapsaml\u0131 \u00f6nlemler ald\u0131lar ve Taksim Meydan\u0131’nda g\u00f6steri yapmakta \u0131srar etmeleri halinde polisin g\u00f6stericilere y\u00f6nelik kuvvet kullanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten a\u00e7\u0131klamalar yapt\u0131lar. Bu ama\u00e7la, 1 May\u0131s 2008 ‘de \u0130stanbul Valisi’nin talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine vapur ve metro seferleri durduruldu, Taksim Meydan\u0131’na \u00e7\u0131kan yollar kapat\u0131ld\u0131 ve Taksim’e giri\u015fi kapatmak i\u00e7in alana ilave polis konu\u015fland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Mahkeme (\u0130HAM), \u0130stanbul Valisi taraf\u0131ndan \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Bayram\u0131 kutlamalar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in d\u00f6rt alternatif toplant\u0131 yerinin \u00f6nerildi\u011fi konusunda bilgi sahibidir. (Tan\u0131d\u0131k geldi mi?)<\/p>\n
Bu ba\u011flamda, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n g\u00f6steri yapmak istedikleri Taksim Meydan\u0131’n\u0131n \u015fehrin kalbinde oldu\u011funu (sadece bizim kalbimizde de\u011filmi\u015f demek ki) ve b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7ekli bir g\u00f6sterinin ger\u00e7ekten kamu hayat\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zlemler. Ne var ki, Mahkeme, 1977’de \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Bayram\u0131 kutlamalar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucunda, 37 ki\u015finin \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc de kaydeder.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak Taksim Meydan\u0131 trajik bir olay\u0131n sembol\u00fc olmu\u015ftur ve bu gerek\u00e7eyledir ki, ba\u015fvurucular \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Bayram\u0131 kutlamalar\u0131n\u0131, Taksim’de anma t\u00f6reni yaparak d\u00fczenlemekte \u0131srar etmektedirler.\u201d<\/p>\n
Kamu otoritelerinin Ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc G\u00f6stermek Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00e7o\u011fulculu\u011fun gere\u011fidir.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130HAM: “Ne var ki, kamuya ait bir mek\u00e2ndaki g\u00f6steri trafikte d\u00fczensizlik de dahil olmak \u00fczere g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayatta baz\u0131 kesintilere yol a\u00e7abilmesine ra\u011fmen, \u015fayet S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 11. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan toplanma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6z\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmayacaksa, bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l toplanmalara y\u00f6nelik olarak belirli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6stermek kamu otoriteleri i\u00e7in g\u00f6revdir. (bak\u0131n\u0131z Galstyan v. Ermenistan, no. 26986\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 116-117, 15 Kas\u0131m 2007 ve Bukta ve Di\u011ferleri v. Macaristan, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III).<\/p>\n H\u00fck\u00fcmetin Bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l G\u00f6sterilerde Pozitif Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/strong><\/p>\n M\u00fcdahalenin \u201cdemokratik bir toplumda gerekli\u201d olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusuna d\u00f6n\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde, Mahkeme birinci planda 11. maddeye ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda tespit etti\u011fi temel ilkelere g\u00f6ndermede bulunur (bak\u0131n\u0131z Djavit An v. T\u00fcrkiye, no. 20652\/92, \u00a7\u00a7 56-57, ECHR 2003-III; Piermont v. Fransa, 27 Nisan 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, Series A no. 314; ve Plattform \u201c\u00c4rzte f\u00fcr das Leben\u201d v. Avusturya, 21 Haziran 1988, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 139). Bu i\u00e7tihatlar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6stermektedir ki yetkililerin hukuki g\u00f6steriler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, bunlar\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bi\u00e7imde s\u00fcrmesini ve b\u00fct\u00fcn vatanda\u015flar\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini temin i\u00e7in uygun \u00f6nlemleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n H\u00fck\u00fcmetin Hakk\u0131n Kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 Engellemede Negatif Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cMahkeme, devletlerin yaln\u0131zca bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l toplanma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc korumak zorunlulu\u011funu de\u011fil, ayr\u0131ca bu hakka ili\u015fkin makul olmayan dolayl\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar uygulamaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nmalar\u0131 zorunlulu\u011funu kaydeder.\u201d<\/p>\n Son olarak (Mahkeme), 11. maddenin temel amac\u0131, korunan haklar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na kamu otoritelerinin keyfi m\u00fcdahalesinden bireyi korumak olsa da, bunlar\u0131n etkin kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131nda pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin de olabilece\u011fini de dikkate al\u0131r, \u00a7 36).”<\/p>\n AKP\u2019nin \u0130HAM S\u00fcrecindeki Tutumu ve Karar\u0131 Yok Saymas\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n AKP’nin 2009’da 1 May\u0131s’\u0131 tatil ilan etmesi, 2010 -2011-2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda Taksim’de g\u00f6steri yap\u0131lmas\u0131na izin vermesi \u00fczerine, AKP\u2019nin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc bizlerin marjinal oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131nda bulunan yanda\u015flara ve yanda\u015f olmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara \u0130HAM inceleme s\u00fcrecini anlatmak gerekiyor.<\/p>\n AKP \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc falan de\u011fil, hi\u00e7bir zaman da olmad\u0131… AKP’nin Taksim Meydan\u0131 ve 1 May\u0131s’la ilgili olarak ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcm kararlar, D\u0130SK-KESK 1 May\u0131s ba\u015fvurusunun incelenme s\u00fcreci ile ilgilidir.<\/p>\n 1. 2008’de ba\u015fvuruyu yapt\u0131k, 19 \u015eubat 2009’da \u0130HAM H\u00fck\u00fcmete, ba\u015fvurumuzdaki iddialar ile 1 May\u0131s i\u00e7in ne gibi \u00f6nlemler ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu, Mart 2009’da 1 May\u0131s tatil ilan edildi.<\/p>\n 2. 2010 tarihinde H\u00fck\u00fcmetin cevaplar\u0131na cevaplar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 ve kan\u0131tlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 ilettik. 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda Taksim yasa\u011f\u0131 kalkt\u0131.<\/p>\n 3. 2010 – 2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u0130HAM ba\u015fvuruyu incelemeye ald\u0131, AKP Taksim kutlamalar\u0131na engel olmad\u0131. \u0130HAM’a \u015firin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcp, karar\u0131 etkilemek i\u00e7in.<\/p>\n 4. 2012 Eyl\u00fcl’\u00fcnde \u0130HAM karar\u0131 Kas\u0131m’da a\u00e7\u0131klayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirdi. Karar hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanmadan bilgi sahibi olan AKP, hukuki kazan\u0131ma ula\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anlad\u0131. 28 Eyl\u00fcl’de Taksim’de in\u015faata ba\u015flad\u0131, fiziksel engel olu\u015fturmak istedi.<\/p>\n 27.11.2012 de karar a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131. H\u00fck\u00fcmet mahkum oldu. Taksim 1 May\u0131s Alan\u0131 ilan edildi.<\/p>\n 1 May\u0131s ciddi bask\u0131 ve a\u011f\u0131r \u015fiddetle engellendi ancak devam eden m\u00fccadele Gezi Direni\u015f’ine zemin olu\u015fturdu.<\/strong><\/p>\n Bug\u00fcne gelindi\u011finde art\u0131k AKP, t\u00fcm hukuk ve mant\u0131k kurallar\u0131n\u0131, insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7e sayarak, hi\u00e7 gerek\u00e7esiz Taksim’i yasakl\u0131yor, gerginli\u011fin su\u00e7unu da, haklar\u0131 \u0130HAM d\u00fczeyinde kabul edilmi\u015f olan Sendikalara ve haklar\u0131na, ya\u015famlar\u0131na, geleceklerine sahip \u00e7\u0131kmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlara y\u00fcklemek istiyor. (Not: \u0130n\u015faat konusu ba\u015fka \u00e7\u0131karlarla birle\u015fmi\u015f olabilir ama zamanlama kesinlikle manidar.)<\/p>\n AKP nas\u0131l bir ideolojiye sahip oldu\u011funu, her g\u00fcn yeniden yeniden g\u00f6steriyor, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fck kesinlikle bunlardan de\u011fil.<\/p>\n Gerginli\u011fi haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmak isteyenler de\u011fil, engelleme yarat\u0131yor. Korku, bask\u0131 ve \u00e7arp\u0131tma ile Taksim’e sahip \u00e7\u0131kmaktan vazge\u00e7meyece\u011fiz.<\/p>\n Art\u0131k AKP, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n bildi\u011fi uluslararas\u0131 d\u00fczeydeki metinlere ili\u015fkin, yalan yanl\u0131\u015f bilgi vermeyi b\u0131rakmal\u0131, karar\u0131 uygulama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmelidir. Buna g\u00f6re de, Taksim’e ula\u015fma yollar\u0131n\u0131 kapatmamal\u0131, tam tersine g\u00f6steriye kat\u0131lacaklar i\u00e7in kolayl\u0131klar sa\u011flamal\u0131, kamu ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 fazlala\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131, kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini de almal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Ancak as\u0131l olan haklar\u0131n iktidar taraf\u0131ndan verilmedi\u011fi sahiplerince al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n Son s\u00f6z niyetine; Kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hak Sana Ait De\u011fildir; 1 May\u0131s’\u0131 Kutlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n Taksim, (Uluslararas\u0131 Mahkemelerce Karara Ba\u011flansa da) Senin Meydan’\u0131n De\u011fildir. Sahip \u00c7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00dclke Senin De\u011fildir.<\/p>\n Merakl\u0131s\u0131na: \u0130HAM karar\u0131n\u0131n tam metni D\u0130SK’in sitesinde yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Seviyorum bu \u00fclkeyi, yasaklamasalar bir g\u00fcn kutlanacak 1 May\u0131s, sayelerinde bir hafta \/bir ay s\u00fcr\u00fcyor, sadece bir meydan de\u011fil \u0130stanbul\u2019un heryeri Taksim oluyor. 1 May\u0131s g\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de ba\u015flamad\u0131 ama \u201cEmek ve Dayan\u0131\u015fma G\u00fcn\u00fc\u201d olarak varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrebilme m\u00fccadelesi hem hukuksal hem eylemsel y\u00f6nden en \u00e7ok T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de veriliyor. Emek\u00e7ilerin ya\u015famlar\u0131 pahas\u0131na sahip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131 Taksim Meydan\u0131, kendine ve […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayilar-1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/44"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}