Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n 149. Kurulu\u015f Y\u0131ld\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc Program\u0131\u2019nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmas\u0131nda, dile getirdiklerinden baz\u0131lar\u0131:<\/p>\n
“16 Nisan 2017 tarihinde halk oylamas\u0131na sunulan ve kabul edilen de\u011fi\u015fiklikle Anayasam\u0131zda var olan kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesi daha da belirgin hale getirilmi\u015ftir”<\/em>\u2026<\/p>\n “Yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ve yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ele\u015ftirilirken idarenin yanda\u015f\u0131 ya da idarenin faaliyetlerine engel \u00e7\u0131karan bir g\u00fc\u00e7 gibi de\u011ferlendirilmemelidir\u201d<\/em>\u2026<\/p>\n “Kararlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n bilimsel ele\u015ftirisine a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131z. Ancak yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131, taraf menfaatlerine g\u00f6re de\u011fil, objektif, bilimsel ve hukuki kriterlere g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Ne yaz\u0131k ki kimi zaman alg\u0131 olu\u015fturmak amac\u0131yla s\u00fcbjektif, haks\u0131z, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz ele\u015ftiri ve de\u011ferlendirmeler, yarg\u0131n\u0131n sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na zarar verici olmaktad\u0131r”<\/em>\u2026<\/p>\n “Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc halin ilan\u0131 ve bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te kabul edilen KHK’lar\u0131n amac\u0131, devletin kurumlar\u0131n\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131ndan ar\u0131nd\u0131rmak ve demokrasiyi korumak olup ki\u015filerin hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine, ama\u00e7 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda herhangi bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilmemi\u015ftir”<\/em>\u2026<\/p>\n Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na, yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131na bak\u0131\u015f\u0131na dair s\u00f6zlerimize, Ba\u015fkan\u0131 oldu\u011fu Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n mahkeme olarak, Yarg\u0131\u00e7lar Sendikas\u0131n\u0131n kuruldu\u011funa ve yasal bir sendika oldu\u011funa dair verdi\u011fi karara uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tekrar hat\u0131rlatarak ba\u015flayal\u0131m[1]<\/a>. Hukuk\u00e7u olmamas\u0131n\u0131n bu davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemesinde olumsuz bir etkisinin oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir belki de.<\/p>\n \u0130ki y\u0131l \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan kurulu\u015f t\u00f6renlerinde, c\u00fcbbesinde d\u00fc\u011fme aray\u0131p bulamaman\u0131n tela\u015f\u0131yla Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131p Ba\u015fbakan\u0131n arkas\u0131ndan ko\u015fturmas\u0131 da muhtemelen kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesine olan s\u0131k\u0131 inanc\u0131yla ilgiliydi. Hukuk\u00e7ular ve siyaset\u00e7iler, hatta ortalama hukuk bilgisi olanlar bilir; kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n temel prensibi, basit olarak yarg\u0131, yasama ve y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin birbirlerinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n \u00d6yleyse hemen s\u00f6ylemek gerekir ki, getirilmek istenilen rejim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi d\u00fcnya literat\u00fcr\u00fcnde mevcut de\u011fildir. Anayasa hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde mutab\u0131k kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek \u015fey “Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 H\u00fck\u00fcmet Sistemi” diye bir y\u00f6netim \u015feklinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmek istenen, T\u00fcrkiye’nin evrensel hukuk ve demokrasi ilkelerinden, d\u00fc\u015fman olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclen laik Cumhuriyet de\u011ferlerinden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, siyasal \u0130slam\u2019a dayal\u0131 bir tek ki\u015fi rejiminin kurulmas\u0131d\u0131r. Son zamanlarda televizyon kanallar\u0131nda Atat\u00fcrk ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ucuz ve kirli yay\u0131nlar yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n, her \u015feye kar\u0131\u015fan RT\u00dcK’\u00fcn bu yay\u0131nlar\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelmesinin, savc\u0131lar\u0131n ancak tepkilerin yo\u011funla\u015fmas\u0131 \u00fczerine harekete ge\u00e7melerinin sebebi de budur. Halk\u0131n, Cumhuriyet<\/em>le bu gerici hesapla\u015fmaya al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 istenmektedir.<\/p>\n Ve yine s\u00f6ylemek gerekir ki, Anayasa De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Halkoylamas\u0131 YSK’n\u0131n tam kanunsuzluk h\u00fckm\u00fcndeki karar\u0131yla \u015faibeli hale gelmi\u015ftir. En k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc, \u015faibenin, halkoylamas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck i\u00e7inde ve g\u00fcvenli bir bi\u00e7imde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendilerine emanet edildi\u011fi on bir “y\u00fcksek yarg\u0131\u00e7” taraf\u0131ndan yarat\u0131lmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu T\u00fcrkiye’nin uzun zaman alt\u0131ndan kalkamayaca\u011f\u0131 bir y\u00fckt\u00fcr.<\/strong> T\u00fcrkiye daha YSK travmas\u0131n\u0131 atlatamam\u0131\u015f iken Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 adalete g\u00fcven endeksini s\u0131f\u0131ra kadar indirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Konuya d\u00f6necek olursak; Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesi ile “yasama” yetkisi, yasama organ\u0131 olan TBMM’den al\u0131narak tek ba\u015f\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fctme organ\u0131 olan Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na verilmektedir. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 art\u0131k sembolik, temsili bir lider de\u011fildir. Ayn\u0131 zamanda bir siyasi partinin genel ba\u015fkan\u0131 olan Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n yasama ve yarg\u0131 alan\u0131na dair her tasarrufu, kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesini yeniden ve yeniden ortadan kald\u0131racakt\u0131r. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na TBMM’yi fesih yetkisinin verilmesini, ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal ilan\u0131 yetkisi ile ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal kararnameleri \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisinin ayn\u0131 elde tutulmas\u0131n\u0131, OHAL ile ilgili Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamelerinin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclememesini, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n aleyhine soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n siyasi parti genel ba\u015fkan\u0131 olarak adayl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirledi\u011fi TBMM \u00fcyelerinin be\u015fte \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fcn \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funa tabi tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 ve Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n geri g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi kanunun TBMM’nin salt \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ile aynen kabul edilebilmesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin her biri, y\u00fcr\u00fctme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn sorumsuz hale gelmesine ve yasama yetkisinin y\u00fcr\u00fctmeye devredilmesine sebep olacakt\u0131r. Bunlar t\u00fcm\u00fcyle de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ise yasama ve y\u00fcr\u00fctme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn tek ki\u015fide, yani Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131nda topland\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar.<\/p>\n Anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile HSYK’n\u0131n “y\u00fcksek”li\u011finin Anayasadan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 yarg\u0131n\u0131n itibar\u0131n\u0131n yok edili\u015fine dair a\u00e7\u0131k bir mesajd\u0131r. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n kendisini yarg\u0131layacak, \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnameleri denetleyecek olan Anayasa Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u00fcyelerinin \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu bizzat, geri kalan\u0131n\u0131 ise adayl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirledi\u011fi milletvekilleri eliyle se\u00e7mesi; \u00f6te taraftan HSK’n\u0131n d\u00f6rt \u00fcyesini do\u011frudan, yedi \u00fcyesini ise kendisinin belirledi\u011fi milletvekilleri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla belirlemesi; Adalet Bakan\u0131 ile M\u00fcste\u015far\u0131n\u0131n ise bizzat Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan atanmas\u0131, hi\u00e7 bir demokratik ilkeyle ba\u011fda\u015fmamakla birlikte yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131racakt\u0131r. <\/strong><\/p>\n Konunun daha iyi anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, HSK’n\u0131n yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yarg\u0131\u00e7l\u0131k teminat\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l ortadan kald\u0131raca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anlat\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul 25. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ve duru\u015fma savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n verdikleri tahliye kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa al\u0131nd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131; Zaman Gazetesi muhabirini tahliye eden Ankara ACM Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n BAM \u00fcyeli\u011fine, bylock tek ba\u015f\u0131na delil olmaz diyen Antalya BAM Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n Konya yarg\u0131\u00e7l\u0131\u011f\u0131na atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; team\u00fcllere ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak Ankara’da g\u00f6rev yapan yarg\u0131\u00e7lardan daha k\u0131demsiz yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n ACM Ba\u015fkanl\u0131klar\u0131na atand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 birer \u00f6rnek olarak an\u0131msamak yeterli olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye ne yaz\u0131k ki yasa ile yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015fine son verilmesi deneyimini ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f, Anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile de yarg\u0131\u00e7lar\u0131n yasayla y\u00fcksek mahkeme \u00fcyeliklerine se\u00e7ilmesine tan\u0131kl\u0131k etmi\u015ftir. Siyasi iktidar HSYK \u00fcyelerinin \u015fimdiye dek yapt\u0131klar\u0131 hizmetlerini, onlar\u0131 yasayla y\u00fcksek mahkeme \u00fcyesi yaparak \u00f6d\u00fcllendirmi\u015ftir. Yukar\u0131da bahsetti\u011fimiz cezaland\u0131rmalar ve -yarg\u0131 camias\u0131nda olanlar\u0131n \u00e7ok\u00e7a bildi\u011fi- \u00f6d\u00fcllendirmeler ile T\u00fcrk yarg\u0131s\u0131na bir \u00f6d\u00fcl-bedel anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015f, \u00f6d\u00fcl-bedel ili\u015fkisi liyakat, k\u0131dem, deneyim gibi eskiden bilinen de\u011ferleri yok etmi\u015ftir. Son yarg\u0131\u00e7 atamalar\u0131n\u0131n genellikle AKP \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinde g\u00f6rev alm\u0131\u015f ve y\u00fcksek mahkeme ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n yak\u0131nlar\u0131 olan avukatlar aras\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 siyasi iktidar\u0131n yarg\u0131y\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ele ge\u00e7irmek i\u00e7in hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yarg\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi evrensel ilkeleri ve fakat en \u00f6nemlisi adalet d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini feda etmesi anlam\u0131na gelmektedir.<\/strong> Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme Ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n, Say\u0131\u015ftay, YSK gibi kurumlar\u0131n ba\u015fkanlar\u0131n\u0131n Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131yla \u00e7ay toplamaya gitmesi, sulama kanal\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131na kat\u0131lmalar\u0131, yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131lar\u0131n siyasi iktidar temsilcileri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda c\u00fcbbelerinin \u00f6nlerini kapay\u0131p, e\u011filip b\u00fck\u00fclmeleri yarg\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda kaybetti\u011fi g\u00fcce tekab\u00fcl eden davran\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi ile Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n, yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131ndan d\u00f6nerek Anayasa ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 OHAL kararnamelerini tamam\u0131yla yarg\u0131sal denetim d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131karmalar\u0131 ve hukuksuz uygulamalar\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye’nin bir ola\u011fan\u0131 haline getirmeleri T\u00fcrkiye yarg\u0131 tarihinin yeni kara lekeleridir.<\/p>\n A\u0130HS ve A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131na, Anayasa ve yasalara ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde, savunma olana\u011f\u0131 dahi tan\u0131nmadan, \u00fczerlerine at\u0131lan su\u00e7 anlat\u0131lmadan on binlerce insan\u0131n i\u015flerinden at\u0131l\u0131p, aile bireylerinin dahi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na izin verilmeyerek \u00f6l\u00fcme terk edilmeleri elbette siyasi iktidar\u0131n hesab\u0131n\u0131 vermesi gereken bir hukuksuzlu\u011fun sonucudur. Hangi \u00f6rg\u00fcte ne \u015fekilde mensup, irtibatl\u0131 veya iltisakl\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 bilmeden i\u015finden at\u0131lan iki gen\u00e7 onurlu insan\u0131n sadece adalet iste\u011fi ile a\u00e7l\u0131k grevine gitmelerinin g\u00f6rmezden gelinmesi ise insanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n katlinin ba\u015fka bir \u00e7e\u015fididir.<\/p>\n Sonu\u00e7 olarak, Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n hakl\u0131 oldu\u011fu bir tek konu vard\u0131r. Yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n objektif, bilimsel ve hukuki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere g\u00f6re de\u011fil de; s\u00fcbjektif, haks\u0131z, \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz, siyasi iktidar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri do\u011frultusundaki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere g\u00f6re verilmeleri yarg\u0131n\u0131n sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na zarar vermektedir. Bu zarar\u0131 en \u00e7ok da bizzat y\u00fcksek mahkemelerin ba\u015fkanlar\u0131 vermektedir. Yarg\u0131\u00e7 ve savc\u0131 atamalar\u0131nda, g\u00fcnl\u00fck siyasete bula\u015fm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuk istismarc\u0131s\u0131 dernek ve vak\u0131flar\u0131n temsilcilerinin tercih edilir olmas\u0131, “yak\u0131n” olman\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131 ve liyakatin \u00f6n\u00fcne konularak \u00f6nemli bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct olarak belirlenmesi yarg\u0131y\u0131 ku\u015fkusuz uzun y\u0131llar i\u00e7inden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lamayacak bir kaosa s\u00fcr\u00fckleyecektir.<\/p>\n [1]<\/a> Bkz. \u201cBirisi Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130daresine Hukuk \u00d6\u011fretsin\u201d, BirG\u00fcn<\/strong>, 08.10.2105. Web eri\u015fim: http:\/\/www.birgun.net\/haber-detay\/birisi-danistay-idaresine-hukuk-ogretsin-91627.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dan\u0131\u015ftay Ba\u015fkan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, Dan\u0131\u015ftay’\u0131n 149. Kurulu\u015f Y\u0131ld\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc Program\u0131\u2019nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmas\u0131nda, dile getirdiklerinden baz\u0131lar\u0131: “16 Nisan 2017 tarihinde halk oylamas\u0131na sunulan ve kabul edilen de\u011fi\u015fiklikle Anayasam\u0131zda var olan kuvvetler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilkesi daha da belirgin hale getirilmi\u015ftir”\u2026 “Yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ve yarg\u0131\u00e7lar ele\u015ftirilirken idarenin yanda\u015f\u0131 ya da idarenin faaliyetlerine engel \u00e7\u0131karan bir g\u00fc\u00e7 gibi de\u011ferlendirilmemelidir\u201d\u2026 “Kararlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n bilimsel ele\u015ftirisine a\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131z. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayilar-7"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}