\u0130nsanl\u0131k tarihinde kutup y\u0131ld\u0131z\u0131 gibi parlayan, ba\u015fta hukuk\u00e7ular olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm adalet sava\u015f\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na her daim yol g\u00f6steren; y\u00fczy\u0131llar ge\u00e7se de par\u0131lt\u0131s\u0131 hi\u00e7 kaybolmayacak olan davalar vard\u0131r. \u0130\u015fin do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi, bu davalar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc mahkemelerin iddia makam\u0131 da yarg\u0131c\u0131 da \u201cm\u00fcesses nizam\u201d\u0131n temsilcileridir. Kahramanlar\u0131 ise, bir \u015fekilde h\u00e2kim s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131yla ters d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri i\u00e7in san\u0131k sandalyesine oturtulan filozoflar, bilim insanlar\u0131, ayd\u0131nlar, \u015fairler, dava adamlar\u0131 veya s\u0131radan yurtta\u015flard\u0131r. \u00c7a\u011flar boyunca bu t\u00fcr davalarda yarg\u0131lanan \u015fahsiyetlerin \u00e7o\u011fu, h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015ftan vermi\u015f mahkemeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; ya hakl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131yla, ya kendilerini bekleyen sonu bildikleri halde onurlar\u0131yla dimdik ayakta durarak ya da itham eden savunmalar\u0131yla m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131 sarsmay\u0131 ba\u015farm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bunlar\u0131n \u00e7ok az\u0131, ancak cezalar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131ndan sonra yine ayn\u0131 mahkemelerce, ama yanmay\u0131 g\u00f6ze alan ezici bir \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ise tarih \u00f6n\u00fcnde ve toplumun vicdan\u0131nda aklanmak suretiyle, insanl\u0131k tarihini ayd\u0131nlatm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yine i\u015fin do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi; bir toplumda siyasi alt\u00fcst olu\u015f ya\u015fanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcesses nizam el de\u011fi\u015ftirmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece; devletin gizli- ger\u00e7ek hukuku \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde g\u00f6rev yapan (buna, \u201cg\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr hukuka g\u00f6re su\u00e7 i\u015fleyen\u201d de diyebiliriz) siyasi akt\u00f6rleri, b\u00fcrokratlar\u0131 ve memurlar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir zaman bu g\u00f6revleri nedeniyle yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hesap vermezler. Verirlerse, bu, asli g\u00f6revlerinden dolay\u0131 de\u011fil, aksine; ya sistemin tahkim edilmesi veya restorasyonu i\u00e7in ya da devletin gizli- ger\u00e7ek hukukunu ihlal ettikleri i\u00e7in olur. Tarih boyunca \u0130ktidarlara kar\u015f\u0131 verilen hak ve s\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fccadeleleri sonucunda, m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131 g\u00f6rece de olsa hukukla s\u0131n\u0131rlayan demokrasi ve onun \u201cHukuk devleti\u201d, \u201cHukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d ve \u201c\u0130nsan haklar\u0131\u201d gibi b\u00fcy\u00fcl\u00fc kavramlar\u0131 ve ilkeleri etraf\u0131nda geli\u015fen; bu \u00f6zellikleriyle Do\u011fu toplumlar\u0131 i\u00e7in her anlamda \u00e7ekim merkezi olan Bat\u0131 Demokrasileri i\u00e7in de durum aynen b\u00f6yledir. Hatta g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde, i\u00e7leri bo\u015falt\u0131larak emperyalizmin ba\u015fl\u0131ca ihra\u00e7 \u00fcr\u00fcnleri aras\u0131nda yerini alan bu b\u00fcy\u00fcl\u00fc kavramlar dahi h\u00e2kim s\u0131n\u0131flar lehine bir tahakk\u00fcm arac\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr[foot]http:\/\/www.halksahnesi.org\/2014\/01\/27\/tarihin-en- buyuk-afyonu-hukukun-ustunlugu-suat-parlar-yigit- tuncay\/[\/foot]. Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle; g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz\u00fcn anl\u0131-\u015fanl\u0131 \u201chukuk devletleri\u201dnde dahi bu derin yap\u0131lanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 bir bariyer olu\u015fturulamam\u0131\u015f; bunlardan yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hesap sorulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun da \u00f6tesinde, gizli-ger\u00e7ek hukukuyla derin devlet yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131k sebebi ve g\u00fcvencesi de bug\u00fcn bizatihi Bat\u0131 Demokrasilerinden ba\u015fkas\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu y\u00fczden m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131n verili \u201cdemokrasi\u201d, \u201cg\u00fc\u00e7ler ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d ve yarg\u0131 d\u00fczeni i\u00e7inde g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr \u201chukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201dn\u00fcn tesis edilebilmesi; \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin ve \u201cinsan haklar\u0131\u201dn\u0131n yarg\u0131 yoluyla g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 da asl\u0131nda bir fanteziden ibarettir.<\/p>\n
Ancak bu ger\u00e7eklik, \u201cderin devlet\u201dten yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hesap sorulamayaca\u011f\u0131 veya bu yap\u0131n\u0131n de\u015fifre edilemeyece\u011fi anlam\u0131na da kesinlikle gelmez. Tam da bu nedenle; m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131n ete-kemi\u011fe b\u00fcr\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f hali olarak devletin s\u00fcsl\u00fc hukuk kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131na gizlenen s\u0131n\u0131f \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131, s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fc d\u00fczene\u011fi ile sistemin g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 faaliyetlerine kar\u015f\u0131 verilecek siyasi-toplumsal m\u00fccadele kadar, yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde verilecek hukuk m\u00fccadelesinin de vazge\u00e7ilmez bir \u00f6nemi vard\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin; bug\u00fcn, anayasal d\u00fczene ve kendi vatanda\u015flar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 silahl\u0131 kalk\u0131\u015fma, sald\u0131r\u0131, sabotaj, kumpas davalar\u0131 gibi her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk ve insanl\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 operasyonlar\u0131 planlay\u0131p, organize eden \u201cderin devlet\u201de (d\u00fcnyada bilinen ad\u0131yla Gladyoya, bizdeki ad\u0131yla Kontrgerillaya) kar\u015f\u0131 verilecek hukuk m\u00fccadelesi de i\u015fte bu nitelikte bir m\u00fccadeledir… Ayn\u0131 zamanda bu m\u00fccadele; m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131n kodlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclebilmesi ve nihayetinde tahakk\u00fcm d\u00fczeninin hukuken ve siyaseten tasfiyesi i\u00e7in de ertelenmez bir insanl\u0131k ve demokrasi g\u00f6revidir.<\/p>\n
Bug\u00fcn (sistem i\u00e7inden gelece\u011fi muhakkak olan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bask\u0131 ve engellemeye ra\u011fmen) m\u00fc\u015fteki\/m\u00fcdahil s\u0131fat\u0131yla taraf\u0131 olunan (ya da olunacak) bir siyasi cinayet, katliam, kumpas soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ve\/veya davas\u0131nda i\u015fe \u00f6ncelikle; sistemin hukuku taraf\u0131ndan davaya san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla monte edilmi\u015f masumlar\u0131 ger\u00e7ek su\u00e7lulardan ay\u0131rmakla ba\u015flamak gerekir. Ard\u0131ndan; san\u0131k sandalyesinde olsun olmas\u0131n, somut olayla do\u011frudan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Gladyo tetik\u00e7ilerinin su\u00e7a konu eylemlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, bu eylemdeki ama\u00e7 ve saikleri ile \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n da; mevzuat, hukuk yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tekni\u011finin verdi\u011fi imkanlarla delillendirilip, mahkemenin (ve tabii ki kamuoyunun da) \u00f6n\u00fcne konmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Mahkemenin tahkikat\u0131 bu y\u00f6nde geni\u015fletmesi ve buna g\u00f6re yeni deliller toplamaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 halinde ise; benzeri olaylar, soru\u015fturma ve davalar aras\u0131ndaki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n somut olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131labilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde de ciddi bir ad\u0131m at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olacakt\u0131r. \u0130\u015fte o zaman, mevcut yarg\u0131lama da ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak bir \u201cderin devlet\u201d yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fecek; mahkeme sonu\u00e7 olarak ne y\u00f6nde h\u00fck\u00fcm verirse versin; \u201cderin devlet\u201d legal- illegal sorumlular\u0131 ve gizli-ger\u00e7ek hukukuyla birlikte kendi yarg\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde (k\u0131smen veya tamamen) de\u015fifre edilmi\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Do\u011fal olarak bu durum da, siyasal-toplumsal muhalefet ve demokrasi g\u00fc\u00e7leri i\u00e7in ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na bir kazan\u0131m olacakt\u0131r. Haliyle o zaman, ucu Bat\u0131 Demokrasilerine uzanan o \u201chukuk devleti\u201dnin, ismiyle m\u00fcsemma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; o s\u00fcsl\u00fc kavram\u0131n ard\u0131nda, ger\u00e7ekte hangi \u201chukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201dn\u00fcn yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 toplum taraf\u0131ndan t\u00fcm \u00e7\u0131plakl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fclecek; mevcut sistemin hukuk sosuna bulanm\u0131\u015f munis \u00e7ehresindeki boya d\u00f6k\u00fcld\u00fck\u00e7e, alt\u0131ndan gizli-ger\u00e7ek hukukuyla m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131n ceberrut \u00e7ehresi arz-\u0131 end\u00e2m edecektir.<\/p>\n
\u00dczerinden \u00e7a\u011flar aksa da, m\u00fcesses nizam\u0131 o g\u00fcn bu g\u00fcnd\u00fcr sarsmaya devam eden tarihsel savunmalar\u0131n g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz\u00fc ayd\u0131nlatan g\u00fcc\u00fcnden hareketle; bu kez sisteminin kendi yarg\u0131s\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde, kendi hukuk tekni\u011fi ve ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla sorguland\u0131\u011f\u0131, de\u015fifre edildi\u011fi bu m\u00fccadele y\u00f6nteminin, (iddiay\u0131 delillendirme, ispat imkanlar\u0131 ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da) politik m\u00fccadele ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla siyaset arenas\u0131nda verilen\/verilecek olan m\u00fccadeleden \u00e7ok daha etkili olaca\u011f\u0131 izahtan varestedir.<\/p>\n
Bunun i\u00e7in; g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz \u015fartlar\u0131nda, sistemle yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lacak bir hesapla\u015fman\u0131n (san\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla) savunma mevziinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra (m\u00fc\u015fteki\/m\u00fcdahil s\u0131fat\u0131yla) art\u0131k iddia makam\u0131 mevziinden de yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Maalesef mahkemeler \u00f6n\u00fcnde bug\u00fcne kadar gerekti\u011fi gibi yap\u0131lmayan da i\u015fte bu t\u00fcr bir m\u00fccadeledir. Oysa bu mevzi, d\u00fcnyada ve \u00f6zellikle uzun zamand\u0131r Gladyonun av sahas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fen \u00fclkemizde -\u015fartlar ne kadar zor olursa olsun- toplumsal ve siyasal muhalefete, (konunun teknik y\u00f6n\u00fc nedeniyle de) en \u00e7ok hukuk\u00e7ulara, her zaman ciddi imkanlar sunmaktad\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yleyken; Gladyonun yarg\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturuldu\u011fu veya bu ama\u00e7la kadrolar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k sandalyesine oturtularak do\u011frudan ya da dolayl\u0131 olarak yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 (birisi Gladyonun dolayl\u0131 olarak soru\u015fturuldu\u011fu \u0130talya\u2019dan; di\u011feri ise; bir siyasi katliam davas\u0131n\u0131n Gladyo davas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fclkemizden olmak \u00fczere) -iki \u00e7arp\u0131c\u0131 istisna d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda- bilinen bir dava \u00f6rne\u011fi de bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130stisnalardan ilki…<\/p>\n
1989 y\u0131l\u0131nda, \u00fclkesindeki faili me\u00e7hul suikastlar\u0131 soru\u015fturan \u0130talyan sorgu h\u00e2kimi Felice Casson\u2019un, \u0130talyan h\u00fck\u00fcmeti ve gizli servislerine y\u00f6nelik, devlet i\u00e7erisinde resmi olarak g\u00f6revlendirilmi\u015f silahl\u0131 bir gizli yap\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin sorusuna, biraz gecikmeli de olsa d\u00f6nemin Ba\u015fbakan\u2019\u0131 Andreotti yan\u0131t verir. Bu yan\u0131ta g\u00f6re; devlet i\u00e7inde gizli servis S\u0130SM\u0130 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilen ve NATO ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi i\u00e7inde olan bir \u00f6rg\u00fct vard\u0131r. Casson\u2019un \u0131srarl\u0131 takibi ve bu konuda kurulan Meclis Komisyonunun talebi ile, Ba\u015fbakan Komisyon\u2019a da ayn\u0131 minvalde bir rapor sunar. Takip eden s\u00fcre\u00e7te, \u00f6nemli devlet adamlar\u0131 da \u00f6rg\u00fcte ili\u015fkin yeni ve \u00f6nemli \u00f6nemli ipu\u00e7lar\u0131 verirler. Nihayet, 1996 y\u0131l\u0131nda Roma savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, S\u0130SM\u0130\u2019nin eski \u015fefi ve eski Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakk\u0131nda devlet g\u00fcvenli\u011fiyle ilgili belgelerde yolsuzluk yapt\u0131klar\u0131, Gladyodan sorumlu S\u0130SM\u0130 eski k\u0131s\u0131m \u015fefi hakk\u0131nda da, g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla dava a\u00e7ar. Ancak yarg\u0131lananlar Gladyo mensuplar\u0131 da olsa; bu dava, bir su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olarak Gladyonun do\u011frudan su\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir dava de\u011fildir. Nitekim, an\u0131lan soru\u015fturmalar ve yarg\u0131lamalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda son derece \u00f6nemli sorular \u201cdevlet s\u0131rr\u0131\u201d kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilerek yan\u0131tlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi; ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta, Gladyonun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 itiraf ederek \u00e7ok istekli gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnse de; k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra aniden tutum de\u011fi\u015ftiren Ba\u015fbakan Andreotti; s\u00fcreci karartma faaliyetinin ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 da h\u00fck\u00fcmetiyle birlikte bizzat \u00e7ekecektir. Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle; m\u00fcesses nizam zincirinin \u00f6nemli bir halkas\u0131 olan \u0130talya\u2019daki emsal davada, Gladyo (dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, NATO\u2019nun gizli ordular\u0131) kamuoyunda bilin\u00e7li olarak yarat\u0131lan alg\u0131n\u0131n aksine; yarg\u0131 marifetiyle sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f, mahk\u00fbm edilmemi\u015f ve\/ veya hi\u00e7bir surette tasfiye de edilememi\u015ftir. Ancak, sistemin yarg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 zorlayarak i\u015fleten cesur bir hukuk\u00e7unun \u00f6zel gayreti, (so\u011fuk sava\u015f\u0131n sona ermesi gibi) d\u00f6nemin getirdi\u011fi imkanlarla birle\u015fince; m\u00fcesses nizama ili\u015fkin d\u00fcnyay\u0131 heyecanland\u0131ran \u00f6nemli bir ger\u00e7ek a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hepsi bu!… B\u00f6ylece; (Her ne kadar, Bat\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmetlerce ya \u201cdevlet s\u0131rr\u0131\u201d kapsam\u0131na al\u0131narak; ya da al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ink\u00e2r politikalar\u0131 hemen devreye sokularak, \u00fcst\u00fc \u00f6rt\u00fclse de), bu kez m\u0131zrak \u00e7uval\u0131 delmi\u015f; o g\u00fcne kadar a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak komplo teorisi diye ge\u00e7i\u015ftirilen bu \u201cderin g\u0131rtlak\u201d da Casson\u2019un hukuk m\u00fccadelesi sonucunda art\u0131k tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z hale gelmi\u015ftir. Tabii bu sayede, \u201chukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d, \u201chukuk devleti\u201d, \u201cinsan haklar\u0131\u201d, \u201cinsanl\u0131\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7\u201d gibi s\u00fcsl\u00fc hukuk kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131na gizlenen Bat\u0131 Demokrasilerinin insanl\u0131k ve hukuk d\u0131\u015f\u0131 politikalar\u0131 ile gizli- ger\u00e7ek hukuku da daha g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr ve tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r hale gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130kinci istisnaya gelince…<\/p>\n
16 Mart 1978 tarihinde, fa\u015fist i\u015fgal alt\u0131ndaki \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi\u2019nden toplu halde \u00e7\u0131kan sol g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fl\u00fc \u00f6\u011frenciler, \u00fczerlerine bomba at\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra silahla taranm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu sald\u0131r\u0131da 7 devrimci \u00f6\u011frenci hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015f ve y\u00fczlercesi de yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u201cadiyen adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme\u201d iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, yarg\u0131lanan t\u00fcm san\u0131klar sonu\u00e7 itibariyle delil yetersizli\u011finden beraat etmi\u015fler ve dava dosyas\u0131 da faili me\u00e7hul olarak adliyenin tozlu raflar\u0131na kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak olaydan on y\u0131l sonra, \u00f6lenlerin d\u00f6nem arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan (i\u00e7lerinde bu makalenin yazar\u0131n\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu) bir grup gen\u00e7 avukat delillerinin \u00e7o\u011fu karart\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bu dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131 yeniden a\u00e7arak, kamuoyuna y\u00f6nelik \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131 ve \u0131srarl\u0131 takipleri ile ge\u00e7en 4 y\u0131l\u0131n sonunda; ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yeni tan\u0131klar, kan\u0131tlar ve faillerle birlikte; m\u00fc\u015fteki\/m\u00fcdahil vekilleri s\u0131fat\u0131yla olay\u0131 ve davay\u0131 bir kez daha yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Ancak; Emniyetin engellemeleriyle uzayan 3 y\u0131ll\u0131k soru\u015fturma ve 1995 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015flayan yarg\u0131lama a\u015famalar\u0131nda her \u015feye ra\u011fmen toplanan \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli delillerle, bu olay\u0131n bir Kontrgerilla eylemi oldu\u011funu tespit eden avukatlar; \u201cadiyen adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme\u201d iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n esasen \u201canayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rma\u201d ve \u201chalk\u0131 silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmaya te\u015fvik\u201d amac\u0131yla i\u015flenmi\u015f \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc ve siyasi saikli bir su\u00e7 oldu\u011funu, bu su\u00e7un da Kontrgerilla taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; delillerin buna g\u00f6re toplanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve san\u0131klara da TCK\u2019nin bu su\u00e7lara ili\u015fkin maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ek savunma hakk\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015flerdir. Bu taleplerinin mahkemece kabul edilmesi \u00fczerine de, dava, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin ilk ve tek Kontrgerilla davas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ard\u0131ndan mahkeme Kontrgerilla faaliyeti olma ihtimali kuvvetle muhtemel olan d\u00f6nemin derdest veya kapanm\u0131\u015f \u00f6nemli siyasi cinayet ve katliam dava dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n celbine de karar vererek; Kontrgerilla faaliyeti oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesi ta\u015f\u0131yan t\u00fcm bu \u00f6nemli olaylar aras\u0131ndaki illiyet ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya koyulmu\u015ftur. Bu arada, 16 Mart faillerinin ad\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi bir M\u0130T belgesinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, Susurluk Kazas\u0131\u2019nda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yasa d\u0131\u015f\u0131 mafya-devlet-siyaset \u00fc\u00e7geninin akt\u00f6rleri ve 16 Mart katliam\u0131 failleri aras\u0131nda kurulan somut ba\u011flant\u0131lar da, m\u00fcdahil avukatlarca mahkemeye sunulan deliller aras\u0131na girmi\u015ftir. Bu geli\u015fmeler \u00fczerine dava \u00fclke g\u00fcndemine otururken; durumdan vazife \u00e7\u0131karan ve ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ba\u011flant\u0131lardan rahats\u0131z olan iktidar mahvillerince de, davaya ve m\u00fcdahil avukatlara y\u00f6nelik operasyonlar da hemen devreye sokulmu\u015ftur. \u00d6rne\u011fin; d\u00f6nemin Adalet Bakan\u0131 Hikmet Sami T\u00fcrk, M\u0130T\u2019in g\u00f6rev ve faaliyetlerine ili\u015fkin bilgi ve belgelerin ele ge\u00e7irilerek yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131n\u0131n su\u00e7 olu\u015fturdu\u011funu an\u0131msatan ve gerekli \u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyen bir genelge yay\u0131nlayarak, C.savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131na g\u00f6ndermi\u015f[foot]http:\/\/www.hurriyet.com.tr\/gundem\/mahkemelere-mit-belgesi-uyarisi-39241532[\/foot]; ard\u0131ndan (mahkemece kendisinden bilgi belge istendi\u011fi halde, \u201cbende belge yoktur\u201d diye olumsuz cevap veren) M\u0130T M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da; \u00f6yle bir belge oldu\u011funu ortaya \u00e7\u0131karan ve an\u0131lan belgeyi mahkemede delil olarak kullanan avukatlar (ve olay\u0131 haber yapan medya kurulu\u015flar\u0131) hakk\u0131nda, su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunarak, dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r[foot]https:\/\/www.yenisafak.com\/gundem\/savunma-yargilaniyor-587217[\/foot].<\/p>\n
Gelinen a\u015famada, davan\u0131n m\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde yo\u011funla\u015fan bask\u0131 ve yarg\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik operasyonlar sonucunda ortaya \u015f\u00f6yle bir dramatik tablo \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r: eski \u0130stanbul adliyesinin giri\u015f kat\u0131ndaki mahkemede, m\u00fcdahil avukatlar devletten hesap sorarken; bir \u00fcst kat\u0131ndaki mahkemede ise devlet (yarg\u0131 \u00fczerinden), s\u0131rf yapt\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6rev nedeniyle (san\u0131k sandalyesine oturttu\u011fu avukat Cem Alptekin\u2019in \u015fahs\u0131nda) m\u00fcdahil avukatlardan hesap sormaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca d\u00f6nemin Adalet Bakan\u0131 Hasan Denizkurdu\u2019nun \u201colur\u2019u\u201d ile, Alptekin hakk\u0131nda ba\u015flat\u0131lan ilk soru\u015fturman\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, son soru\u015fturma karar\u0131 veren mahkemenin ba\u015fkan\u0131 da 16 Mart Davas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc mahkemeye ba\u015fkan olarak atanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r… B\u00f6ylece dava her y\u00f6n\u00fcyle ku\u015fat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcdahil avukatlar\u0131n \u201creddi hakim\u201d talebi nedeniyle, yeni ba\u015fkan kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ilk duru\u015fmada davadan \u00e7ekilmek zorunda kalsa da; mahkemenin \u0131srarl\u0131 taleplerine ve avukatlar\u0131n t\u00fcm u\u011fra\u015flar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, ba\u015fta M\u0130T olmak \u00fczere, baz\u0131 devlet kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n direnci nedeniyle, \u00e7ok \u00f6nemli delilleri toplama i\u015fi tamamlan\u0131p, bunlar\u0131n de\u011ferlendirmesi safhas\u0131na bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc ge\u00e7ilemeyecek ve dava h\u0131zla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na do\u011fru g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclecektir[foot]https:\/\/www.birgun.net\/haber-detay\/dosya-ogrenciler-gibi-hukuk-da-katledildi-32217.html[\/foot]. Bunun \u00fczerine, m\u00fcdahil avukatlar da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131rlar… Asl\u0131nda bu tart\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 1996 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki Susurluk kazas\u0131nda 16 Mart\u2019a ili\u015fkin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan yeni kan\u0131tlar ve faillerle ilgili yapt\u0131klar\u0131 su\u00e7 duyurusuna ili\u015fkin verilen \u201czamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u201d karar\u0131na itirazla \u00e7ok \u00f6nceden ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. 16 Mart davas\u0131n\u0131n final a\u015famas\u0131nda tekrar ettikleri itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 da \u015fudur: TCK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re; bu t\u00fcr yarg\u0131lamalarda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve faaliyetinin sona erdi\u011fi g\u00fcne kadar i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamaz. Devlet i\u00e7indeki su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc Kontrgerillan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve faaliyeti ise halen s\u00fcrmektedir -eldeki t\u00fcm kan\u0131tlar da bunu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6stermektedir-. Bu durumda \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn m\u00fctemadi (kesintisiz) ve m\u00fcteselsil (zincirleme) c\u00fcr\u00fcmleri devam etti\u011fi, yani temadi veya tesels\u00fcl kesilmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece (b\u0131rak\u0131n dolmas\u0131n\u0131 bir yana) zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye dahi ba\u015flamaz (eski TCK. md. 103). \u00dcstelik buna doktrin kadar uygulama da izin vermez. Zira; bidayette anayasal d\u00fczeni hedef alan silahl\u0131 \u201csol\u201d \u00f6rg\u00fctlere ve eylemlerine ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lamalarda, mahkemeler; bu \u00f6rg\u00fctlerin faaliyetlerini ve \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyelerinin bu kapsamda i\u015fledikleri su\u00e7lar\u0131 \u201ctamamiyle icra olunmu\u015f c\u00fcr\u00fcm\u201d olarak g\u00f6rmeyip, \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc c\u00fcrm\u00fcn kesintisiz devam etti\u011finden ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerinin de i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle, bu san\u0131klar\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015fler ve Yarg\u0131tay da bu kararlar\u0131 bir g\u00fczel onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7tihat haline gelen emsal kararlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Kontrgerilla yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndaki \u00e7ifte standard\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne seren; adaletten uzak duran adalet sisteminin \u00e7arp\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yarg\u0131 \u00fczerinde cari olan gizli-ger\u00e7ek hukukun kodlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131karan avukatlar; benzeri davalarda kendileri gibi vekalet \u00fcstlenen meslekta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n ve hukuk kurumu olan barolar\u0131n bu konudaki derin sessizli\u011fine; \u00f6zellikle de \u0130stanbul Barosunun, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de \u201cderin devlet\u201d ger\u00e7e\u011fini, (neredeyse bir iddianame gibi, somut eylemleri ve ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131yla) ilk kez bu kadar kapsaml\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyan kendi Komisyonunun haz\u0131rlam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu Susurluk Raporunu has\u0131ralt\u0131 etmesine \u00e7ok sert tepki g\u00f6stermi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
Ger\u00e7ekten de, bug\u00fcn \u00fclkemizde ya\u015fanan siyasi cinayet, katliam, kumpas ve sair eylemlerin arkas\u0131nda \u201cderin devlet\u201din, nam-\u0131 di\u011fer Kontrgerillan\u0131n oldu\u011fu herkes\u00e7e bilinir; yaz\u0131l\u0131r-\u00e7izilir; sorumlulardan hesap sorulmas\u0131 istenir; ancak i\u015f dava boyutuna geldi\u011finde bu tespit ve taleplerin gere\u011fi hukuken yap\u0131lmaz. Hatta, maalesef, \u0130stanbul Barosu \u00f6rne\u011finde oldu\u011fu gibi, \u00e7ok daha k\u00f6t\u00fcs\u00fc de yap\u0131l\u0131r… B\u00f6ylece Kontrgerilla faaliyeti kapsam\u0131ndaki siyasi cinayet ve katliamlara ili\u015fkin eylemlerin \u00e7o\u011fu faili me\u00e7hul olarak kapat\u0131l\u0131rken; tesad\u00fcfen veya kasten ele ge\u00e7irilen bir-iki tetik\u00e7inin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, \u00e7o\u011fu su\u00e7la ve \u00f6rg\u00fctle hi\u00e7 ilgisi olmayanlar\u0131n san\u0131k sandalyesine oturtuldu\u011fu \u201cadiyen adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme\u201d davalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r ve \u00f6ylece de devam eder… Bazen isabetle, su\u00e7un anayasal d\u00fczene kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flendi\u011fi (Sivas Katliam\u0131 Davas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi) tespit edilse de; bu t\u00fcr davalar\u0131n b\u0131rak\u0131n bir Kontrgerilla yarg\u0131lamas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclmesini, \u00e7o\u011fu dava s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde, her nedense, bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ad\u0131 bile telaffuz edilmez.<\/p>\n
Ancak 16 Mart Katliam\u0131 Davas\u0131, yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcndeki bu uyu\u015fmac\u0131\/uzla\u015fmac\u0131 gelene\u011fi k\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Tahmin edilece\u011fi \u00fczere; 16 Mart Davas\u0131 ku\u015fat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktadan itibaren, ayn\u0131 ara kararlar\u0131n tekrar\u0131yla ge\u00e7en rutin duru\u015fmalar ve avukatlar\u0131n itiraz, tepki ve boykotlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda sistemin hedefledi\u011fi 30 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131 doldurarak, 2008 y\u0131l\u0131nda, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcr ve tabii sistem de rahat bir nefes al\u0131r. 1992 y\u0131l\u0131nda ikinci kez yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131nan 16 Mart Katliam\u0131 Davas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131 ve kamuoyu \u00f6n\u00fcnde s\u00fcren 16 y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fc b\u00f6ylece biter. Bu karar kamuoyunda yank\u0131 ve infial yarat\u0131r. Hatta bu infialin etkisiyle d\u00f6nemin Adalet Bakan\u0131 M. Ali \u015eahin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yaparak, davan\u0131n savc\u0131 ve hakimlerine tepki g\u00f6sterir, ard\u0131ndan da idari soru\u015fturma a\u00e7ar. Tabii ne bu soru\u015fturmada ne de avukatlarca temyiz edilerek Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6nderilen dosya a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan karar ve sonu\u00e7 de\u011fi\u015fmeyecektir.<\/p>\n
Ne tesad\u00fcft\u00fcr ki; sistemin yarg\u0131s\u0131, ger\u00e7ek Kontrgerilla Davas\u0131n\u0131 \u0130stanbul\u2019da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kapatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn, Silivri Cezaevi kamp\u00fcs\u00fcnde kurulan ibretlik bir mahkemede \u201cErgenekon\u201d ad\u0131yla maruf, \u00e7akma Kontrgerilla davas\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131yordu. 16 Mart Davas\u0131n\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 da bu ger\u00e7e\u011fi, o g\u00fcn kendilerine uzat\u0131lan medya mikrofonlar\u0131na aynen b\u00f6yle ifade ediyorlard\u0131[foot]http:\/\/www.cumhuriyet.com.tr\/haber\/diger\/231090\/Kilometre_tasi_oldu.html[\/foot].<\/p>\n
Ergenekon davas\u0131 ile birlikte, adalet \u201csaraylar\u0131\u201ddan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p cezaevlerinde adalet da\u011f\u0131tma a\u015famas\u0131na ge\u00e7en sistem ve onun ileri demokrasisi; adalet ad\u0131na vites y\u00fckselterek \u201cderin devlet\u201dle yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde hesapla\u015fmaya soyunuyordu!.. Bunun bir hesapla\u015fma oldu\u011fu do\u011fruydu; ancak somut olayda kimin kimle hesapla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fi biraz kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kt\u0131!.. Sistem, Casson\u2019un \u0130talya\u2019da de\u015fifre etti\u011fi NATO men\u015feli \u201cderin devlet\u201din art\u0131k ink\u00e2r edilemez bir ger\u00e7eklik oldu\u011funun ve NATO \u00fcyesi T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de de bu konunun ciddi boyutta tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve hatta yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcne ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n fazlas\u0131yla bilincindedir. Bu noktadan hareketle; Ergenekon davas\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla adeta bir ta\u015fla birka\u00e7 ku\u015f vurmaya giri\u015fecektir. Bu vesile ile hem bir emperyal proje olan \u201ckent devleti\u201dne ge\u00e7i\u015fte iktidara engel te\u015fkil eden, TSK\u2019nin kemalist-laik b\u00fcrokrasisi, hem \u00f6nemli sol-kemalist siyasi akt\u00f6rler tasfiye edilecek; hem de bu s\u00fcrece \u201cderin devlet\u201dle hesapla\u015fma k\u0131l\u0131f\u0131 ge\u00e7irilerek \u201cileri demokrasi\u201dye \u00e7a\u011f atlatacakt\u0131r!<\/p>\n
Tabii bunun i\u00e7in de, toplumun ve kamuoyunun Ergenekon\u2019un T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin \u201cderin devleti\u201d oldu\u011funa ve bu dava sayesinde \u00fclkenin \u201cstat\u00fcko\u201d ile hesapla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na, ba\u011f\u0131rsaklar\u0131n\u0131 temizledi\u011fine inanmas\u0131, daha do\u011frusu inand\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Bunun i\u00e7in, \u201cStat\u00fcko\u201dyu egemen s\u0131n\u0131f; olup-biteni ise devrim ya da reform sanan, sistem analizi yapmaktan bihaber kesim i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir ihtiya\u00e7 olmasa da; bu s\u00fcrece kayg\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcphe ile bakan toplumun \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu, \u00f6zellikle de hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 ikna etmek i\u00e7in her t\u00fcrl\u00fc propaganda ve r\u0131za \u00fcretim arac\u0131ndan sonuna kadar yararlan\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Hatta bu ama\u00e7la alay-\u0131 v\u00e2l\u00e2 ile T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye davet edilen, \u0130talyan h\u00e2kim Felice Casson\u2019a \u201cderin devlet\u201d \u00fczerine konferans verdirilecek; (s\u00f6zleri de bir g\u00fczel \u00e7arp\u0131t\u0131larak) Ergenekonun, T\u00fcrk Gladyosu oldu\u011fu; bu i\u015fin \u201culuslararas\u0131 uzman\u0131\u201d say\u0131lan mutemet ki\u015fiye teyit ettirilecektir!.. Maalesef, medya bombard\u0131man\u0131 ve neo-liberallerin stratejik katk\u0131s\u0131yla, bir k\u0131s\u0131m \u201csol\u201d zevat (ki, bunlar\u0131n i\u00e7inde hukuk\u00e7u olanlar da vard\u0131r) bu hik\u00e2yeye (neredeyse kasti bir safl\u0131kla) inanacakt\u0131r!.. Oysa, bu konularda herkesten fazla merakl\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheci ve sorgulay\u0131c\u0131 olmas\u0131 gereken bu kesim \u00e7ok basit bir sorunun cevab\u0131n\u0131 da biraz olsun merak etmi\u015f olmal\u0131yd\u0131. O soru \u015fudur: Bug\u00fcn NATO\u2019nun gizli ordusu \u201cderin devlet\u201din varl\u0131k sebebi olan ve global kapitalizmin ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7eken ABD ve AB ile birlikte Bat\u0131\u2019ya ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 olan T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin bu yap\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7inde kalarak \u201cderin devlet\u201dle hesap kesmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fcd\u00fcr?<\/p>\n
Bunun m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak ya\u015fay\u0131p g\u00f6ren, daha do\u011frusu g\u00f6rmek zorunda kalanlar, hatta t\u00fcm ya\u015fananlar\u0131 g\u00f6rmek yerine; bu davada kurunun yan\u0131nda ya\u015flar\u0131n ve bir\u00e7ok muhalif ayd\u0131n\u0131n neden ve nas\u0131l yand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7 \u00f6nemsemeden, kullan\u0131m s\u00fcresi doldu\u011fu i\u00e7in o torbaya at\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir- iki k\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 art\u0131\u011f\u0131na bakarak, \u201cama orada \u201cderin devlet vard\u0131!..\u201d diye h\u00e2l\u00e2 ihtirazi kay\u0131t ileri s\u00fcrebilen \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheci ayd\u0131n\u201dlarla (!), bug\u00fcn yarg\u0131n\u0131n \u201cderin devlet\u201dle FET\u00d6 \u00fczerinden hesapla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia edebilen \u201cinanm\u0131\u015f ayd\u0131n\u201dlar\u0131 (!) eldeki mevcut teknolojiyle ayd\u0131nlatabilecek g\u00fc\u00e7te bir \u0131\u015f\u0131k olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 muhakkakt\u0131r!.. Hukukun ve adaletin yaln\u0131zca sistem taraf\u0131ndan y\u00f6netilip ara\u00e7salla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir d\u00f6nemde yarg\u0131n\u0131n \u201calt\u0131n g\u00fcn\u00fc\u201d olamaz, olmayacakt\u0131r. Tabii b\u00f6ylesine derin saplant\u0131lar\u0131yla bile-isteye sistem i\u00e7in bariyer g\u00f6revi g\u00f6ren \u201cayd\u0131n\u201d zevat\u0131n da yatacak yeri olmayacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 olarak; ucu \u201cderin devlet\u201de \u00e7\u0131kabilecek siyasi cinayet, katliam ve kumpas davalar\u0131nda siyasal-toplumsal muhalefetin, en \u00e7ok da hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc hukuk ve yarg\u0131 manip\u00fclasyonuna kar\u015f\u0131 do\u011fru hat \u00fczerinde mevzilenip; do\u011fru hedefe y\u00f6nelmek ve nihayetinde Kontrgerillay\u0131 san\u0131k sandalyesine oturtup yarg\u0131lamak; dolay\u0131s\u0131 ile sistemin kodlar\u0131n\u0131 de\u015fifre etmek gibi zorlu ve zorunlu bir g\u00f6revi vard\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de, -16 Mart Katliam\u0131 Davas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda- b\u00f6yle bir davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, bundan sonra g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi anlam\u0131na da kesinlikle gelmez.<\/p>\n
Bunun i\u00e7in t\u00fcm mesele niyette ve y\u00fcrektedir[foot]Burada yeri gelmi\u015fken; Kontrgerillay\u0131 1972 y\u0131l\u0131nda ilk kez de\u015fifre ederek m\u00fccadelemize \u0131\u015f\u0131k tutan, (2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda kaybetti\u011fimiz) y\u00fcrekli ayd\u0131n Talat Turhan\u2019\u0131n ve 16 Mart Katliam\u0131 Davas\u0131nda y\u0131llarca omuz omuza m\u00fccadele verdikten sonra (2015 y\u0131l\u0131nda kaybetti\u011fimiz) dostumuz Avukat Emcet Olcaytu\u2019nun de\u011ferli an\u0131lar\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde sayg\u0131yla e\u011filiyoruz.[\/foot]…<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130nsanl\u0131k tarihinde kutup y\u0131ld\u0131z\u0131 gibi parlayan, ba\u015fta hukuk\u00e7ular olmak \u00fczere t\u00fcm adalet sava\u015f\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na her daim yol g\u00f6steren; y\u00fczy\u0131llar ge\u00e7se de par\u0131lt\u0131s\u0131 hi\u00e7 kaybolmayacak olan davalar vard\u0131r. \u0130\u015fin do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi, bu davalar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc mahkemelerin iddia makam\u0131 da yarg\u0131c\u0131 da \u201cm\u00fcesses nizam\u201d\u0131n temsilcileridir. Kahramanlar\u0131 ise, bir \u015fekilde h\u00e2kim s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131yla ters d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri i\u00e7in san\u0131k sandalyesine oturtulan filozoflar, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[209],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3972","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayilar-20"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3972","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3972"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3972\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3972"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3972"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3972"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}