I\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi\u2019nden \u201cbir gecede c\u0327ekilme\u201d karar\u0131na ilis\u0327kin iptal davalar\u0131n\u0131n durus\u0327malar\u0131 Dan\u0131s\u0327tay\u2019da go\u0308ru\u0308lmeye devam ederken ve bu durus\u0327malara destek ic\u0327in u\u0308lkenin do\u0308rt bir yan\u0131ndan birc\u0327ok insan Ankara\u2019da bulus\u0327urken, \u201cI\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi’nin iptal edilmesi iyi oldu\u201d diyen P\u0131nar Gu\u0308ltekin\u2019in katiline “haks\u0131z tahrik” indirimi ile 23 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verildi.<\/p>\n
Bu kararla go\u0308rdu\u0308k ki, u\u0308lkemiz c\u0327ocug\u0306unu veya kad\u0131n\u0131n\u0131 s\u0327iddetten, tacizden, istismardan koruyamad\u0131g\u0306\u0131 gibi \u201cayn\u0131lar\u0131 tekrar yas\u0327anmas\u0131n\u201d diye verilen cezalarda dahi cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olam\u0131yor, yap\u0131lanyarg\u0131lamalardasuc\u0327lularaadeta\u201caferin\u201d deniyor. Avrupa I\u0307nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi o\u0308nu\u0308nde aile ic\u0327i s\u0327iddet nedeniyle vatandas\u0327lar\u0131n\u0131 koruyamad\u0131g\u0306\u0131 ic\u0327in ilk kez ceza alan u\u0308lke olan u\u0308lkemiz (Opuz karar\u0131), bu karar\u0131n ilham oldug\u0306u I\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi olarak bilinen Kad\u0131na Yo\u0308nelik S\u0327iddet ve Aile I\u0307c\u0327i S\u0327iddetin O\u0308nlenmesi ve Bunlarla Mu\u0308cadeleye Dair Avrupa Konseyi So\u0308zles\u0327mesi\u2019ndendebirgece,hukuksuzcaal\u0131nan cumhurbas\u0327kan\u0131 karar\u0131 ile c\u0327ekildi.<\/p>\n
I\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi ise bildig\u0306iniz gibi kad\u0131na kars\u0327\u0131 s\u0327iddeti bir insan hakk\u0131 ihlali ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k tu\u0308ru\u0308 olarak tan\u0131mlayan ve bu kapsamda hukuki bag\u0306lay\u0131c\u0131l\u0131g\u0306\u0131 olan ilk uluslararas\u0131 belge. Bu kapsamda da kad\u0131nlar\u0131n gu\u0308c\u0327lendirilmesi, kad\u0131n -erkek es\u0327itsizlig\u0306inin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ic\u0327in taraf devletlere c\u0327es\u0327itli politikalar\u0131 ve uygulamalar\u0131 yapmak konusunda yu\u0308ku\u0308mlu\u0308lu\u0308k yu\u0308klemektedir.<\/p>\n
Yani devlet,
\nS\u0327iddete kars\u0327\u0131 o\u0308nleyici politikalar olus\u0327turmak S\u0327iddet mag\u0306durunu s\u0327iddet tehlikesinden korumak
\nS\u0327iddeti bir suc\u0327 olarak go\u0308rmek ve s\u0327iddet uygulay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 yarg\u0131lamak
\nVe bunlar\u0131n tamam\u0131 ic\u0327in bu\u0308tu\u0308ncu\u0308l politikalar olus\u0327turmak zorundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ancak So\u0308zles\u0327me kabul edildig\u0306inden beri etkili kullan\u0131labilmis\u0327 midir, imza at\u0131larak yu\u0308klenilen bu yu\u0308ku\u0308mlu\u0308lu\u0308kler yeterince yerine getirilebilmis\u0327 midir, bunun konus\u0327ulmas\u0131 gerekirken veya I\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesine dayan\u0131larak haz\u0131rlanan 6284 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ailenin Korunmas\u0131 ve Kad\u0131na Kars\u0327\u0131 S\u0327iddetinO\u0308nlenmesineDairKanun\u2019uuygulamayan kolluk kuvvetlerinin, gerekli sorus\u0327turmay\u0131 yapmayan ve delillerin u\u0308stu\u0308nu\u0308n o\u0308rtu\u0308lmesine neden olan savc\u0131lar\u0131n, tutuklama karar\u0131 vermeyen hakimlerin; ic\u0327 is\u0327leri politikalar\u0131nda kad\u0131nlar\u0131n ve c\u0327ocuklar\u0131n fiziksel ve ruhsal gu\u0308venlig\u0306ini o\u0308ncelig\u0306ine almayan yu\u0308ru\u0308tmenin sorumlulug\u0306u gu\u0308ndeme getirilmesi gerekirken meclis karar\u0131 ile onaylanarak yu\u0308ru\u0308rlu\u0308g\u0306e giren bir uluslararas\u0131 so\u0308zles\u0327menin, Cumhurbas\u0327kan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tek bas\u0327\u0131na \u201cfeshedilmesi\u201dnin usule uygun olup olmad\u0131g\u0306\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131s\u0327\u0131yoruz bugu\u0308n. Bunun cevab\u0131n\u0131, sadece hukukc\u0327ular deg\u0306il, herkes biliyor, Cumhurbas\u0327kan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n tek bas\u0327\u0131na bo\u0308yle bir karar\u0131 alma yetkisi yoktur. Ancak zaten bu karar\u0131n hukuki oldug\u0306unu kim du\u0308s\u0327u\u0308ndu\u0308 ki? Tu\u0308rkiye\u2019de uluslararas\u0131 antlas\u0327malar\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131 konusu, mu\u0308nhas\u0131ran yu\u0308ru\u0308tme yetkisi alan\u0131nda bulunan bir konu deg\u0306ildir. Bu konu ayn\u0131 zamanda yasama yetkisi alan\u0131nda da bulunur. Zira bir uluslararas\u0131 antlas\u0327man\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131 ic\u0327in her s\u0327eyden o\u0308nce yasama organ\u0131n\u0131n bu uluslararas\u0131 antlas\u0327man\u0131n onaylanmas\u0131n\u0131 kanunla uygun bulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
***<\/p>\n
Yaz\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131n\u0131 Hukuk Defterleri’nin 36. say\u0131s\u0131nda okuyabilirsiniz.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi\u2019nden \u201cbir gecede c\u0327ekilme\u201d karar\u0131na ilis\u0327kin iptal davalar\u0131n\u0131n durus\u0327malar\u0131 Dan\u0131s\u0327tay\u2019da go\u0308ru\u0308lmeye devam ederken ve bu durus\u0327malara destek ic\u0327in u\u0308lkenin do\u0308rt bir yan\u0131ndan birc\u0327ok insan Ankara\u2019da bulus\u0327urken, \u201cI\u0307stanbul So\u0308zles\u0327mesi’nin iptal edilmesi iyi oldu\u201d diyen P\u0131nar Gu\u0308ltekin\u2019in katiline “haks\u0131z tahrik” indirimi ile 23 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verildi. Bu kararla go\u0308rdu\u0308k ki, u\u0308lkemiz c\u0327ocug\u0306unu veya kad\u0131n\u0131n\u0131 s\u0327iddetten, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[316],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5091","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sayi36"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5091","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5091"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5091\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5091"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5091"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5091"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}