{"id":5888,"date":"2025-04-28T23:01:32","date_gmt":"2025-04-28T20:01:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/?p=5888"},"modified":"2025-04-28T23:01:32","modified_gmt":"2025-04-28T20:01:32","slug":"yarginin-siyasallasmasinin-avukatlik-pratigindeki-izdusumu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/?p=5888","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131n\u0131n Siyasalla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n Avukatl\u0131k Prati\u011findeki \u0130zd\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00dclkemizde yarg\u0131 kurumlar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir zaman silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesine geni\u015f \u00f6nemler atfeden bir yap\u0131da olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131, her zaman hiyerar\u015fik olarak y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin alt\u0131nda yer alan kolluk taraf\u0131ndan dayanakland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, avukatlara delil toplama hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f, hukuk davalar\u0131 ile di\u011fer idari i\u015flemler ise derin b\u00fcrokratik engeller ve y\u00fcksek giderlerle birlikte hak arama h\u00fcrriyetini modern hukuk tarihimizin ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak t\u00fcm bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara ra\u011fmen avukatl\u0131k, ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir meslek olmay\u0131 bir nebze s\u00fcrd\u00fcrebilmi\u015f, son on be\u015f y\u0131la kadar da sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bir nebze koruyabilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>Ne var ki \u00fclkemizde sermaye, b\u00fcrokrasi ve siyaset \u00fc\u00e7geninin son iki anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle birlikte yarg\u0131y\u0131 da t\u00fcmden eline alarak yeknesak bir kuvvet olu\u015fturup otoriterle\u015fmesiyle paralel olarak, \u00fcniversiteler enflasyona u\u011frat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f di\u011fer t\u00fcm uzmanl\u0131k meslekleri gibi hukuk meslekleri de kamuda kolayl\u0131kla kadrola\u015f\u0131lan, \u00f6zel sekt\u00f6rde ise i\u015f\u00e7ile\u015fen bir hale getirilmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n do\u011fal bir sonucu olarak T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de avukatl\u0131k, mevzuattaki g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcklerin yan\u0131nda sahada da b\u00fcy\u00fck engellerle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131r hale gelmi\u015f, avukatlar eme\u011fine yabanc\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yaz\u0131 avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n pratik sorunlar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz y\u0131llarda ne raddeye geldi\u011fini yazarlar\u0131n kendi meslek g\u00f6rg\u00fcleri ve bilgileri \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcnde kimi \u00f6rneklerle anlatmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemelerinin oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde, bu mahkemelerin do\u011fal h\u00e2kim ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, hakkaniyetsiz ve yanl\u0131 kararlar verdi\u011fi konusunda Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, d\u00f6nemin ayd\u0131nlar\u0131 ve hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131 hemfikirdi. Ancak 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00d6zel Yetkili Mahkemeler ile d\u00f6nemin kendi otoritesi yine katalog baz\u0131 su\u00e7larda baz\u0131 \u00f6zel yetkiler \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f ve bu durum 2014\u2019e kadar s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Sonras\u0131nda ise sulh ceza mahkemeleri, sulh ceza hakimli\u011fine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde ise, t\u00fcm mahkemelerin \u00f6zel yetkili hale geldi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemek yanl\u0131\u015f olmaz. Yarg\u0131n\u0131n bir di\u011fer aya\u011f\u0131 olan savc\u0131l\u0131klar 2010\u2019lu y\u0131larda uygulama yoluyla ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00fcd\u00fcm\u00fc alt\u0131ndayd\u0131. Kanuni altyap\u0131s\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u201cg\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u201d ya da \u201ciade\u201d gibi y\u00f6ntemler kullanarak savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerine m\u00fcdahale ediliyordu. 2021 y\u0131l\u0131na gelindi\u011finde 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 18.maddesine ekleme yap\u0131larak ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerinde yasal olarak da h\u00e2kim haline gelmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>T\u00fcm bunlar olurken durum genel avukatl\u0131k prati\u011fine de yans\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adliyeler kurumsalla\u015fm\u0131\u015f, 2011\u2019de \u0130stanbul Adliyesi, Avrupa yakas\u0131n\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda birle\u015ftirirken;\u00a02013\u2019te \u0130stanbul Anadolu Adliyesi,\u00a0Anadolu\u00a0Yakas\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0birle\u015fik\u00a0adliyesi haline gelmi\u015ftir.\u00a02013\u2019ten itibaren ise\u00a0\u00f6n b\u00fcrolar\u0131n kurulmas\u0131yla\u00a0art\u0131k soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n\u00a0vek\u00e2letnamesiz sorgulan\u0131p\u00a0sorgulanamayaca\u011f\u0131 incelenip incelenemeyece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken, 2020 y\u0131l\u0131na gelindi\u011finde -her ne kadar y\u00fcr\u00fctme makam\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f belirtmesi \u00e7ok do\u011fru olmasa da- Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019n\u0131n yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile\u00a0bu\u00a0sorun\u00a0en az\u0131ndan k\u0131smen\u00a0\u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fmu\u015ftur (<a href=\"https:\/\/cigm.adalet.gov.tr\/Resimler\/SayfaDokuman\/1112021141024Avukat%C4%B1n%20Dosya%20%C4%B0ncelemesi.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/cigm.adalet.gov.tr\/Resimler\/SayfaDokuman\/1112021141024Avukat%C4%B1n%20Dosya%20%C4%B0ncelemesi.pdf<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>Yine \u0130stanbul Barosu\u2019nun CMK servisi o d\u00f6nemler n\u00f6bet\u00e7i savc\u0131lar\u0131n telefon numaralar\u0131na ula\u015fabiliyorken art\u0131k bu numaralar payla\u015f\u0131lmamaktad\u0131r. \u0130stanbul Adliyesi\u2019nin Bodrum 9. kat\u0131nda bulunan nezarethanesine 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda avukatlar girebiliyor, adliye i\u00e7erisinde olan \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda bilgi alabiliyorlard\u0131. 2019 y\u0131l\u0131na gelindi\u011finde ise bu bilgi emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden bile zor al\u0131n\u0131r hale gelmi\u015ftir. Halbuki Yakalama, G\u00f6zalt\u0131na Alma ve \u0130fade Alma Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi\u2019nde bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik de bulunmamaktayd\u0131. \u00d6nceleri g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda adli muayene a\u015famas\u0131ndan adliyedeki nezarethaneye kadar her a\u015famada m\u00fcvekkilini takip eden, polis arac\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde dahi m\u00fcvekkili \u015f\u00fcpheliyle g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015febilen avukat profili art\u0131k emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinden bilgi dilenir duruma getirilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6yle ki bug\u00fcn, \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc personelleri \u015f\u00fcpheli m\u00fcdafilerini kendi \u00f6zel telefonlar\u0131ndan ifadeye bile \u00e7a\u011f\u0131ramamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>Bir ba\u015fka durum ise tutukluluk incelemelerinde meydana gelmi\u015ftir. 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda getirilen d\u00fczenleme ile tutukluluk incelemelerinde kanundaki metniyle \u201c\u015f\u00fcpheli ya da m\u00fcdafi bulundurulmas\u0131\u201d \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Ancak bu konuda her\u00a0h\u00e2kim ve\u00a0mahkeme farkl\u0131 yorumlar getirmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Mahkemeler\u00a0ve hakimliklerin bug\u00fcn bile\u00a0bir k\u0131sm\u0131\u00a0yaln\u0131zca avukat\u0131\u00a0bir k\u0131sm\u0131 yaln\u0131zca \u015f\u00fcpheliyi\u00a0dinlemektedir,\u00a0bir\u00a0k\u0131sm\u0131 ise\u00a0haz\u0131r bulunsa dahi avukat\u0131 dinlememektedir.\u00a0D\u00fczenlemenin ilk y\u0131llar\u0131nda kimi h\u00e2kimlikler dosyada \u00f6zel m\u00fcdafi bulunsa dahi CMK sistemi \u00fczerinden zorunlu m\u00fcdafi atamalar\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin Bar\u0131\u015f\u00a0Terko\u011flu\u00a0ve Bar\u0131\u015f Pehlivan\u2019\u0131n tutuklu oldu\u011fu dosyada \u00f6zel m\u00fcdafi bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen baroca avukat atanm\u0131\u015f, bu durum d\u00f6nemin\u00a0\u0130stanbul Barosu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet Durako\u011flu taraf\u0131ndan\u00a0da\u00a0sosyal medyada payla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DURAKOGLU2016\/status\/1257728689317376001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/x.com\/DURAKOGLU2016\/status\/1257728689317376001<\/a>) \u00a0O d\u00f6neme kadar rutin\u00a0bir\u00a0uygulama olan bu hususun\u00a0\u0130stanbul\u00a0Barosu\u00a0Y\u00f6netimi taraf\u0131ndan bile o an fark edilmesi savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n arkas\u0131nda meslek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn bile durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yaz\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131n\u0131 Hukuk Defterleri&#8217;nin 42. say\u0131s\u0131nda okuyabilirsiniz.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00dclkemizde yarg\u0131 kurumlar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir zaman silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesine geni\u015f \u00f6nemler atfeden bir yap\u0131da olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131, her zaman hiyerar\u015fik olarak y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin alt\u0131nda yer alan kolluk taraf\u0131ndan dayanakland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, avukatlara delil toplama hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f, hukuk davalar\u0131 ile di\u011fer idari i\u015flemler ise derin b\u00fcrokratik engeller ve y\u00fcksek giderlerle birlikte hak arama h\u00fcrriyetini modern hukuk tarihimizin ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":98,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/98"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hukukdefterleri.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}